Social Icons

Showing posts with label victims. Show all posts
Showing posts with label victims. Show all posts

Friday, December 28, 2012

Previous shooting victims: lessons

Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 1, position 8754.
????? ????? ????? ???? 1999 ?- Los AngelesThe ?????? ??? ???? ??????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ????? ??????, saysNow ??? ????? ????? ????, ???????? ???? ??? ??? ??????? ???? ???? "??? ?? ???? ????? ??? ?????," ???? ???? ?????? ?????: ????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ?? ?? ??? ????? ???? CNN ??? ?????? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????.

??? ???'?? (CNN) – ?????? ????, ???? ?'?? Stepakoff ???? ??? ??????? ?????? ?- 49 ????? ?- 10 ??????? 1999.

?? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??????? ???? ???? ?? ???? ??? ????? ??????? ?????? ???? ???'?? ???? ????. ????? ??? ??? ?????, ??? ????? ?????.

Stepakoff, ??? ?????? ???? ??? ??, ??? ??? ?? ????? ?????. ??? ??? ??? ????? ??? ???? ??? ???? ???.

??? ??? 6 ????, ??? ???? ????? ??? ???? ????? ???????? ??????? ?? ??? ??? ????? ????? ????. ??? ?????? ?? ???????, ???????, ??? ??? ?? ???, ??? ??? ?????, ??? ??? ?????.

??? ?????? ??????? '???? ???' ?????? ????????

Elizabeth Cohen???? ???????, ?????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ?????? Hook ?? ????, ?? ??? ??? ????? ??????, ???? Stepakoff, ????? 19.

??? ??? ??????? ???? ????. "?? ????? ??????, ??????, ????? – ??? ?? ?????? ???? - ???? ??? ??????," ??? ???. "??? ????? ?? ???? ???. ??? ???? ?? ????."

?? ???? ?????? ??? ?????, ????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ?????, ??? Stepakoff ??? ????? ??? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ?? ????.

"?? ?? ????,"??? ???? ???? ???? ????? ????,"?? ???,"??? ???? ????? ???,"" ?'?? ???? ?????? ????? ?? ?????? ??? ???? ???'??.

??? ?? ???? Hook ?? ???? ?????? ???? ?? ???? ???

???? ??, ?? ??? 5 ???? ????? ????? ?????? ?? Josh 13 ???? ????, ??? ???? ?? ??? ???? ???? ????? ?? ??? ???? ???? ???? ????, ?????? ????? ????? ??? ???? ?????.

var currExpandable = "expand112"; ?? (typeof-CNN.expandableMap==='object'){CNN.expandableMap.push(currExpandable);}var mObj={};mObj.type='video';mObj.contentId= '-mt-bts-aurora-shooting-victims-00015506-story-body.jpg";mObj.lgImageX=300;mObj.lgImageY=169;mObj.origImageX="214";mObj.origImageY="120";mObj.contentType='video ';CNN.expElements.expand112Store=mObj;var currExpandable = "expand212"; ?? (typeof-CNN.expandableMap==='object'){CNN.expandableMap.push(currExpandable);}var mObj={};mObj.type='video';mObj.contentId= ' 121219025144-ac-ct-shooting-amazing-grace-tribute-00025321-story-body.jpg";mObj.lgImageX=300;mObj.lgImageY=169;mObj.origImageX="214";mObj.origImageY="120";mObj.contentType='video ';CNN.expElements.expand212Store=mObj;var currExpandable = "expand312"; ?? (typeof-CNN.expandableMap==='object'){CNN.expandableMap.push(currExpandable);}var mObj={};mObj.type='video';mObj.contentId= "; mObj.source='us/2012/12/16/ct-shooting-memorial-pkg.cnn';mObj.videoSource='CNN';mObj.videoSourceUrl= ' contenttype ?? = '?????';CNN.expElements.expand312Store=mObj;var currExpandable = "expand412"; ?? (typeof-CNN.expandableMap==='object'){CNN.expandableMap.push(currExpandable);}var mObj={};mObj.type='video';mObj.contentId= ' 121220040356-ac-newtown-tribute-in-danbury-tuchman-00012413-story-body.jpg";mObj.lgImageX=300;mObj.lgImageY=169;mObj.origImageX="214";mObj.origImageY="120";mObj.contentType='video ';CNN.expElements.expand412Store=mObj;"?? ?????? ????? ??? ?????,"??? ???.

????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????, ??????? ??????, ?? ???? ????? ????? ?????. ??????, ????? ???? ???? ???? ' ? ??? ???'?? ??? ?? ????? ???? ????? ???? ??? ??? ??? ??.

"?? ?????? ????? ???, ??? ?? ???? ????? ???? ???," ??? Stepakoff. "?? ????? ????? ??? ?? ???? ????? ???. ????? ????? ??? ???? ???? ????? ???, ???? ??????."

Stepakoff ???? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?? ???? Hook ?? ????, ???????? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ??????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ??????.

??????? ????? ???? ????? ?- 6 ?- 56

??? ??? ???? - ?? ??

"?? ????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?? ??, ????? ?? ?????? ?? ??," ???? Stepakoff. "?? ????? ???? ???? ?? ??, ?????? ?? ??."

????? ?? ????? ??? ??? ????? ???????

??? Stepakoff ??? ??? ????, ???? ?? ???? ?? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ?????, ?? ?? ??? ??? ????? ??????. ?? ?? ?????? ????? ?????? ??????, ?????? ???? ?????, ????? ????? ???? ?????, ?? ?????? ?????? ?? ???.

"?????? ??? ??? ?????," ??? ???.

????? ?????? ????? ?? ????

????, Stepakoff ????? ????? ?? ??????? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ????, ????? ???? ???? ??????? ??????.

?'???? Zidell, ???? ?????? ???? ? ??? ???'?? ???? ???? ????. ??? ??? ?? 6 ???? ????.

""??? ???? ???? ???? ?????, ??? ??? ???? ??? ????? ???? ??????? ???? ????? ?? CNN. "????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ????."

???? ?? ?????? ????

??? ?? ?'???? Zidell, Zidell ??????, ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?? ????? ????, ?? ???? ????? ?? ????. "?? ???? ?? ?? ???? ???? ?????," ??? ?????.

???? ???? ??? ??? ???

????, ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ?? ??? ??? ??? ??? ????? ????? ??? ???????.

"?????? ??? ???, ' ??? ???? ?? ???? ???? ????? ?? ???,'" ??? ???? ?? ????.

????? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ??????

ADVERTISEMENT??? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????? ???, ???? ?????. 12 ????? 2012 - ????? 2204 GMT (0604 HKT) ???? ??? ???? ?????? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ?? ???????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ??? ????, ??? ????? ??????. 30 ?????? 2012 - ?????? 2226 GMT (0626 HKT) ????? ???????? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ???????? ??-??-?? ???? ?????? ?? ??????, ????? ????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ????. ????? 21, 2012 - ?????? 2208 GMT (0608 HKT) ???? ?? ????? "????" ?? ???? ???, ?? ?? ???? ??? ??? ??????? ????? ?? Medicine.November 5, 2012 - 2225 ????? GMT (0625 HKT) ???? ??? ????, ??? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ?????, ??? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ????. ????? 8, 2012 - ?????? 1545 GMT (2345 HKT) ???? ????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ?? ???? ????? ???? ???? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?? ???? ????. ????? ??????? ?? ???? ???????? ?????MoreADVERTISEMENT

View the original article here

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

The Violence Against Women Act Must Protect All Victims

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

May 14 2012

By Laura Vazquez, Legislative Analyst, Immigration Policy Project

The NCLR Affiliate Network includes organizations that provide critical services to victims of domestic violence and abuse. When the House Judiciary Committee debated H.R. 4970, the “Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012” (VAWA), I was thinking of them. I was thinking of the survivors of domestic violence who have come through their doors. It is these clients that Congress has sought to protect in its history of reauthorizing VAWA. However, H.R. 4970 eradicates protections desperately needed for immigrant survivors of domestic violence. The Latin American Community Center’s Domestic Violence Program, an NCLR Affiliate in Delaware, said, “we witness firsthand how immigrant victims are already at a disadvantage when getting victim protections.” It is because of these stories and because of the fact that far too many immigrants are victims of domestic violence that NCLR strongly opposes H.R. 4970.

In 1994, VAWA was enacted to protect victims of domestic violence. Recognizing that abusers often exploit a victim’s immigration status, Congress created tools to assist survivors in coming forward to report the crime and assist law enforcement in prosecuting the abusers. Community-based organizations, including some NCLR Affiliates, have taken these tools not only to protect immigrant women, but to assist in the prosecutions of the abusers. According to the Department of Justice, since the passage of VAWA, incidences of domestic violence have decreased by more than 50%.

H.R. 4970 seeks to take those tools away, putting victims at risk and giving power to perpetrators of domestic violence, stalking, sex crimes, and human trafficking. H.R. 4970 would effectively prevent immigrant victims from applying for protection from their abusers. It radically changes the current application process for immigrant women and puts steep new hurdles to eligibility in the path of immigrant survivors seeking protection under VAWA. We urge the House of Representatives to reject H.R. 4970 because it denies victims protection and deters victims of crime from cooperating with law enforcement. We hope that Congress can return to the long-standing intent of VAWA and pass a bill that protects all victims of domestic violence.

Issues:
Geography:California, Far West, Midwest, Northeast, Southeast, Texas


View the original article here

The Violence Against Women Act Must Protect All Victims

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

May 14 2012

By Laura Vazquez, Legislative Analyst, Immigration Policy Project

The NCLR Affiliate Network includes organizations that provide critical services to victims of domestic violence and abuse. When the House Judiciary Committee debated H.R. 4970, the “Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012” (VAWA), I was thinking of them. I was thinking of the survivors of domestic violence who have come through their doors. It is these clients that Congress has sought to protect in its history of reauthorizing VAWA. However, H.R. 4970 eradicates protections desperately needed for immigrant survivors of domestic violence. The Latin American Community Center’s Domestic Violence Program, an NCLR Affiliate in Delaware, said, “we witness firsthand how immigrant victims are already at a disadvantage when getting victim protections.” It is because of these stories and because of the fact that far too many immigrants are victims of domestic violence that NCLR strongly opposes H.R. 4970.

In 1994, VAWA was enacted to protect victims of domestic violence. Recognizing that abusers often exploit a victim’s immigration status, Congress created tools to assist survivors in coming forward to report the crime and assist law enforcement in prosecuting the abusers. Community-based organizations, including some NCLR Affiliates, have taken these tools not only to protect immigrant women, but to assist in the prosecutions of the abusers. According to the Department of Justice, since the passage of VAWA, incidences of domestic violence have decreased by more than 50%.

H.R. 4970 seeks to take those tools away, putting victims at risk and giving power to perpetrators of domestic violence, stalking, sex crimes, and human trafficking. H.R. 4970 would effectively prevent immigrant victims from applying for protection from their abusers. It radically changes the current application process for immigrant women and puts steep new hurdles to eligibility in the path of immigrant survivors seeking protection under VAWA. We urge the House of Representatives to reject H.R. 4970 because it denies victims protection and deters victims of crime from cooperating with law enforcement. We hope that Congress can return to the long-standing intent of VAWA and pass a bill that protects all victims of domestic violence.

Issues:
Geography:California, Far West, Midwest, Northeast, Southeast, Texas


View the original article here